Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WIAPP 42 - State v. Warbelton

State v. Warbelton’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably State v. Warbelton (2009), Hegwood v. Town of Eagle Zoning Board of Appeals (2013)

28 state decisions

240200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Liparota v. United States · Dixon v. United States · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'as part of a whole; in relation to the language of surrounding or closely related statutes.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the nature of that element is more in the nature of a penalty enhancer rather than in what's typically a jury determination. We would be willing to stipulate not only to the prior acts but it's our position we would waive the jury trial on that particular issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]tatutory interpretation begins with the statute's text; we give the text its common ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that we give technical or specially defined words their technical or special definitions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.