Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WIAPP 62 - State v. Kramer

State v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Whren v. United States · Horton v. California · Cady v. Dombrowski · Scott v. United States · Brigham City v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Local police officers ... frequently investigate vehicle accidents in which there is no claim of criminal liability and engage in what, for want of a better term, may be described as community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “An action is 'reasonable' under the Fourth Amendment, regardless of the individual officer's state of mind, 'as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify [the] action.' The officer's subjective motivation is irrelevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.