Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WIAPP 96 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2020

14 state decisions

100200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 65 Wis. 2d 331 - Bailey v. State · 55 Wis. 2d 21 - Ver Hagen v. Gibbons · 198 Wis. 2d 516 - State v. Williams · 2004 WI App 129 - Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd. · State v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a party against whom estoppel is sought presents a later position that is clearly inconsistent with the earlier position; (2) the facts at issue are the same in both cases; and (3) the party to be estopped convinced the first court to adopt its position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the defendant has the right to cross-examine witnesses at a preliminary hearing, Wis. Stat. § 970.03 (5), the scope of cross-examination is limited to issues of plausibility of the State's witnesses' accounts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'Judicial estoppel is a doctrine that is aimed at preventing a party from manipulating the judiciary as an institution by asserting a position in a legal proceeding and then [later] taking an inconsistent position.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.