Proffit v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2023
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Crawford v. Washington · Lancaster v. State · Dysthe v. State · Wilks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On review, our primary consideration is the reasonableness of the trial court's decision.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRUYETTE v. Wyoming
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.