Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WY 118 - Granzer v. State

Granzer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably Miranda Rose Mraz v. State (2016), Smith v. State (2009)

55 state decisions

370200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an error in failing to instruct the jury on an essential element of an offense is not part of the limited class of fundamental constitutional errors 'so intrinsically harmful as to require automatic reversal (Me. affect substantial rights) without regard to their effect on the outeome.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial court's failure to instruct on an element of a crime is not a fundamental error requiring automatic reversal, but rather a trial-type error subject to harmless error analysis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “must show a clear and unequivocal rule of law was violated, the violation clearly appears in the record, and it resulted in denial of a substantial right to her material prejudice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.