Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2008 WY 87 - Daniel v. State

Daniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. Ohio · Bowen v. Yuckert · Garrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court reviews de movo the question of whether a defendant's constitutional protection against double jeopardy has been violated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The district court denied the motion. Mr. Mebane challenges that decision in this appeal. We affirm. ISSUE [¶2] The issue presented is whether Mr. Mebane's separate convictions and sentences on two charges of delivery of a controlled substance violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. STANDARD OF REVIEW [¶3]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.