2009 Ark. App. 373 - Gholson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Francis v. Protective Life Insurance · State v. Dawson · Luckes v. Luckes · McCuen v. State · Webb v. Honorable Todd Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id., at 190-91 . It also relied on Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 60, which the Supreme Court of that state had held to apply in criminal cases 'where it recognized a trial court's power to correct a judgment nunc pro tunc to make it speak the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defined a true clerical error, one that may be correct by nunc pro tunc order, as essentially one that arises not from an exercise of the court's judicial discretion but from a mistake on the part of its officers (or perhaps someone else).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.