2009 Ark. App. 654 - Hayes v. Otto’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ford v. Ford · McWhorter v. McWhorter · Griffin v. First Nat. Bank of Crossett · 79 Ark. App. 178 - Davis v. Davis · Evans v. Tillery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“due to an individual, regardless of source, including wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, worker's compensation, disability, payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program, and interest. Id. ; see also McWhorter v. McWhorter , 346 Ark. 475 , 481, 58 S.W.3d 840 , 844 (2001). Our supreme court has stated that income”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grimsley v. Drewyor“is intentionally broad and designed to encompass the widest range of sources for the support of minor children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grimsley v. Drewyor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.