2009 Ark. App. 799 - Mosley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the key word is 'suspects,' and reasonable suspicion does not require that an officer 'rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.' " Casey v. State , 2016 Ark. App. 98 , at 7, 483 S.W.3d 327 , 331. In determining whether an officer had reasonable suspicion, courts recognize that "when used by trained law enforcement officers, objective facts, meaningless to the untrained, can be combined with permissible deductions from such facts to form a legitimate basis for suspicion of a particular person and for action on that suspicion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Taff v. State

2. “in the performance of his duties, stop and detain any person who he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit (1) a felony, or (2) a misdemeanor involving danger of forcible injury to persons or of appropriation of or damage to property, if such action is reasonably necessary either to obtain or verify the identification of the person or to determine the lawfulness of his conduct.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2015 Ark. App. 37 - Tankersley v. State

3. “a suspicion based on facts or circumstances which of themselves do not give rise to the probable cause requisite to justify a lawful arrest, but which give rise to more than a bare suspicion; that is, a suspicion that is reasonable as opposed to an imaginary or purely conjectural suspicion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2015 Ark. App. 37 - Tankersley v. State