In Re David H.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 33 Cal. 4th 892 - People v. Brown · Holland v. Sebunya · Mehlhorn v. Derby · State v. Rioux · Fowler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] court is not required to hold an evidentiary hearing, even when a party asserts that such a hearing is necessary, to receive evidence in support of a Rule 60(b) motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when a parent promptly moves for relief from judgment pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) based on ineffective assistance of counsel, it is for the trial court to determine what process is necessary to meaningfully assess a parent's claim while balancing the State's important interest in expeditiously establishing permanent plans for children. Such a determination will necessarily call upon a trial court to tailor the process to the facts and circumstances of each case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he court did not err in considering and deciding the [mother's] Rule 60(b) motion[ ] ... based on affidavits presenting [her] best case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.