State v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2025
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Kentucky v. Stincer · State v. Van Kirk · State v. Tapson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we apply a harmless error analysis under which the State has the burden to demonstrate that there is no 'reasonable possibility' that the defendant's absence from the critical stage caused him prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hatfield“'the only means to meet that burden-the court record-was not preserved by reason of the commission of the error itself,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hatfield“we have reversed where the lack of a complete record makes it impossible to say that there was no prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hatfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.