Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 MT 134 - State v. Hill

State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

41 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bowley · State v. Rardon · Norwood v. Service Distributing, Inc. · State v. Mason · State v. Rardon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court may consider at sentencing ostensible crirnes or misconduct which has neither been adrnitted by the defendant nor proven by the State to have occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.