Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 MT 211 - State v. McLaughlin

State v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2026

22 state decisions

120200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Just · State v. Matt · State v. Weeks · State v. Derbyshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where also the declaration, act or omission, forms part of a transaction, which is itself the fact in dispute, or evidence of that fact, such declaration, act or omission, is evidence, as part of the transaction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when a district court acts arbitrarily without the employment of conscientious judgment or exceeds the bounds of reason, in view of all the circumstances....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in order to provide context to the criminal act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.