Deichl v. Savage’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Osterman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Gabriel v. School Dist. No. 4, Libby · Whalen v. Snell · Howard v. Dooner Laboratories, Inc. · Baldridge v. Board of Trustees, Rosebud County School District 19
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the defendant made a representation as to a past or existing material fact; 2) the representation must have been untrue; 3) regardless of its actual belief, the defendant must have made the representation without any reasonable ground for believing it to be true; 4) the representation must have been made with the intent to induce the plaintiff to rely on it; 5) the plaintiff must have been unaware of the falsity of the representation; it must have acted in reliance upon the truth of the representation, and it must have been justified in relying on the representation; 6) the plaintiff, as a result of his or her reliance, sustained damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.