Rohrer v. Knudson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2022
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. · Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Montes · 201 Ill. 2d 403 - Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. · Gray v. North Carolina Insurance Underwriting · Plath v. Schonrock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful”). Florida, Idaho and Montana have specific statutory provisions that give weight to federal interpretations of the law. See FLA. STAT. § 501.204(2) (stating that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“due consideration and great weight shall be given to the interpretation of the federal trade commission and the federal courts relating to section 5(a)(1) of the federal trade commission act ...,” and that the Idaho statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[mJost states with consumer protection acts patterned after § 5(a)(1) of the FTC Act interpret unfairness as described in the landmark United States Supreme Court case, FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.