Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 MT 43 - State v. Simpson

State v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ashby · State v. Kroll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless a condition is legally mandated, conditions of probation should not be imposed as standard or stock requirements. Rather, sentencing must be individualized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.