State v. Cybulski’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Gunderson (2010), State v. Daniels (2011)
89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ariegwe · State v. Rosling · State v. Swann · State v. Bieber · State v. Mizenko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all pretrial motions must be in writing and must be supported by a statement of the relevant facts upon which the motion is being made. ... [t]he motion must state with particularity the grounds for the motion and the order or relief sought”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Huffine“a rational trier of fact could find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Heron
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.