Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 ND 105 - State v. Ripley

State v. Ripley’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Riemers v. City of Grand Forks · In Interest of JB · Froistad v. State · State v. Foster · Everett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurors also, at each adjournment of the court, whether permitted to separate or required to be kept in charge of officers, must be admonished by the court that it is their duty not to converse among themselves nor with anyone else on any subject connected with the trial, nor to form or express any opinion thereon, until the case is finally submitted to them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.