Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 ND 165 - State v. Vandehoven

State v. Vandehoven’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bruce · United States v. Barrett · State v. Bates · State v. Magnuson · State v. Blurton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Issues not raised in the district court will not be addressed for the first time on appeal, unless the alleged error rises to the level of obvious error affecting substantial rights under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To establish obvious error, a defendant must show (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.