Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2009 ND 187

Ernst v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2009

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2009-11-17

Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · Kansas v. Crane · Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F.

Decided 2009-11-17

¶1Filed 11/17/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72009 ND 185

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11In the Matter of E.W.F.

¶12

¶13Cass County State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

¶14

¶15v.

¶16

¶17E.W.F., Respondent and Appellant

¶18

¶19

¶20

¶21No. 20090082

¶22

¶23

¶24

¶25Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

¶26

¶27AFFIRMED.

¶28

¶29Per Curiam.

¶30

¶31Ryan J. Younggren, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for petitioner and appellee.

¶32

¶33Richard E. Edinger, P.O. Box 1295, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1295, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶34Matter of E.W.F.

¶35No. 20090082

¶36

¶37Per Curiam.

¶38[¶1] E.W.F. appeals a district court order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.  E.W.F. argues his civil commitment violates his substantive due process rights as announced in Kansas v. Crane , 534 U.S. 407 (2002), and Kansas v. Hendricks , 521 U.S. 346 (1997).  We have previously addressed and rejected this argument.   Matter of E.W.F. , 2008 ND 130, ¶¶ 17-21, 751 N.W.2d 686.

¶39[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), as well as under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), Matter of E.W.F. , 2008 ND 130, 751 N.W.2d 686.

¶40[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶41Dale V. Sandstrom

¶42Daniel J. Crothers

¶43Mary Muehlen Maring

¶44Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶45

/2009/nd/187 · .json · Public domain