Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 ND 210 - State v. Grant

State v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Yazzie · Livingood v. Meece · State v. Janda · Cameron v. Otto Bock Orthopedic Industry, Inc. · State v. Sabinash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court views the evidence most favorable to the verdict and all reasonable inferences drawn from such evidence. The defendant must show the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, reveals no reasonable inference of guilt. This Court will not weigh conflicting evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses; rather, we will only reverse a conviction if no rational fact-finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so long as the relationship between the person seeking treatment and this third party is sufficiently close to ensure the guaranty of trustworthiness inherent in the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.