Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 ND 47 - State v. Bethke

State v. Bethke’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · William Garland v. State of Washington · State v. Blue · State v. Smuda · State v. Berger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will not reverse a trial court’s findings of fact in preliminary criminal pro ceedings if, after the conflicts in the testimony are resolved in favor of affir-mance, there is sufficient competent evidence fairly capable of supporting the findings and if the trial court’s decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.