Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 ND 51 - Langer v. Pender

Langer v. Pender’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2025

1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

170200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Metcalf v. Security International Insurance Co. · Ellingson v. Knudson · Riemers v. Grand Forks Herald · White v. Altru Health System · Hecker v. Stark County Social Service Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General rules of construction of written documents apply to the construction of trust instruments. See Alerus, 2008 ND 104 , ¶¶ 18-1 9, 750 N.W.2d 412 . In North Dakota, the interpretation of a contract is governed by N.D.C.C. ch. 9-07. Under N.D.C.C. § 9-07-02, the contract language governs its interpreta- . tion “if the language is clear and explicit and does not involve an absurdity.” Contracts are construed to give effect to the parties’ mutual intention at the time of contracting “so far as the same is ascertainable and lawful.” N.D.C.C. § 9-07-03. The rules provided in N.D.C.C. ch. 9-07 are applied “[f]or the purpose of ascertaining the intention of the parties to a contract, if otherwise doubtful....” N.D.C.C. § 9-07-03. “When a contract is reduced to writing, the intention of the parties is to be ascertained from the writing alone if possible, subject, however, to the other provisions of [N.D.C.C. ch. 9-07].” ■ N.D.C.C. § 9-07-04. “The whole of a contract is to be taken together so as to give effect to every part if reasonably practicable. Each clause is to help interpret the others.” N.D.C.C. § 9-07-06.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen you intend the facts to which the law attaches a consequence, you must abide the consequence whether you intend it or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.