State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Olander · State v. Skjonsby · State v. Nordquist · State v. Kraft · State v. Demery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The power to notice obvious error is one we exercise cautiously and only in exceptional circumstances. It should be exercised only where a serious injustice has been done to the defendant. In assessing the possibility of error concerning substantial rights under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b), we examine the entire record and the probable effect of the actions alleged to be error in light of all the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lehman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.