Moore v. State

¶1Filed 6/17/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72009 ND 100

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11In the Interest of I.W. and D.A., children

¶12

¶13Wanda Larson, Dickey County Director

¶14of Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee

¶15

¶16v.

¶17

¶18I.W.; D.A., Jr.;

¶19C.W., mother; Z.W., father;

¶20D.A., Sr., father, Respondents

¶21

¶22C.W., mother, Respondent and Appellant

¶23

¶24

¶25

¶26No. 20090032

¶27

¶28

¶29

¶30Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

¶31

¶32AFFIRMED.

¶33

¶34Per Curiam.

¶35

¶36Gary D. Neuharth, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 346, Oakes, N.D. 58474-0346, for petitioner and appellee.

¶37

¶38Kent M. Morrow, 411 North Fourth Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.

¶39Interest of I.W. & D.A.

¶40No. 20090032

¶41

¶42Per Curiam.

¶43[¶1] C.W., the mother of I.W. and D.A., Jr., appeals a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights.  The children’s fathers, whose parental rights were also terminated, did not appeal.  C.W. argues the court erred in not individualizing its findings as to each child and in terminating her parental rights, because there was insufficient evidence to establish that deprivation of the children was likely to continue.  We conclude the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

¶44[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶45Dale V. Sandstrom

¶46Daniel J. Crothers

¶47Mary Muehlen Maring

¶48Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶49