State v. Bloomer’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 314 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 318 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Singleton (2009), 161 Ohio St. 3d 285 - State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion) (2020)
4 federal appellate · 314 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Barnes · Ex parte United States · State v. Bezak · State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward · State v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 318 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the absence of a proper sentencing entry imposing postrelease control, the parole board's imposition of postrelease control cannot be enforced. Imposition of punishment is a function of the judicial branch of government.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roberts · State v. Hall“{¶ 25} “[T]he legislature has now amended R.C. 2929.14(F)(1) to provide: ‘If a court imposes a sentence including a prison term of a type described in this division on or after July 11, 2006, the failure of a court to include a post-release control requirement in the sentence pursuant to this division does not negate, limit, or otherwise affect the mandatory period of post-release control that is required for the offender under division (B) of section 2967.28 of the Revised Code.’ Nothing in that division, however, provides that the executive branch may impose postrelease control if the sentencing court has not ordered it, nor does its language conflict with our precedent. However, a sentencing court must impose postrelease control before an offender completes the stated term of imprisonment. * * * We therefore reverse the decision of the court of appeals and discharge [the defendant].””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weems · State v. Hall“our existing precedent - that it notify the offender of the mandatory nature of the term of postrelease control and the length of that mandatory term and incorporate that notification into its entry.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Green · State v. Cockroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.