Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 OHIO 2961 - State v. Trimble

State v. Trimble’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

409
cited by 409 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 405 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt · Smith v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 409 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allow a jury to reasonably reject the greater offense and find the defendant guilty on a lesser included (or inferior degree) offense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] jury instruction on a lesser included offense is required only where the evidence presented at trial would reasonably support both an acquittal of the crime charged and a conviction on the lesser included offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In this case * * * the reference to Trimble's prior conviction was a brief and isolated remark that was followed by a curative instruction. The mere mention of Trimble's conviction, without more, did not unfairly prejudice Trimble so as to require a mistrial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.