Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 OK 56 - Wilson v. Webb

Wilson v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Hough v. Leonard · Niemeyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Whitehorse v. Johnson · Pan v. Bane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he general philosophy in [Oklahoma's Pleading Code, 12 O.S.2011, § 2001 et seq .] is that pleadings should give fair notice of the claim and be subject to liberal amendment, should be liberally construed so as to do substantial justice, and that decisions should be made on the merits rather than on technical niceties.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he contents of the pretrial order shall supersede the pleadings and govern the trial of the case unless departure therefrom is permitted by the Court to prevent manifest injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.