Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 OKCR 20 - Love v. State

Love v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York v. Belton · City of New Orleans v. Dukes · Dodd v. State · Nealy v. State · Seabolt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he term "trafficking" as used in this statute does not create a presumption a defendant sold the drugs or intended to sell drugs. Rather, the Legislature, in one part of the statute, has defined "trafficking" as possessing specific amounts of a controlled dangerous substance. The statute merely sets forth guidelines for punishment, and represents a determination by the Legislature that "those who possess [a drug in excess of a specified amount] deserve a stiff punishment."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “those who possess [a drug in excess of a specified amount] deserve a stiff punishment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.