DARITY v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Frazier v. Cupp · Grimm v. United States · United States v. Rengifo · 216 Ill. App. 3d 323 - People v. Witherspoon · 105 Ill. App. 3d 264 - People v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden of proving the invalidity of a search warrant rests on the accused who seeks to suppress the resulting evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. STATE v. WALLACE · STATE v. WALLACE“personal service of a search warrant has never been a condition precedent to a reasonable search under the Oklahoma Constitution or any act of the Oklahoma Legislature”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“nothing in the Oklahoma Statutes or Constitution requires that police always deal truthfully with the targets of criminal investigations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.