2009 Pa. Super. 230 - Commonwealth v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Commonwealth v. Hawkins · 2000 Pa. Super. 145 - Commonwealth v. Hennigan · 2009 Pa. Super. 137 - Commonwealth v. Gonzalez · 2004 Pa. Super. 244 - Commonwealth v. Frye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the illegally obtained evidence ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means, the evidence is admissible. ' The purpose of the inevitable discovery rule is to block setting aside convictions that would have been obtained without police misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.