Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 SD 10 - State v. Reay

State v. Reay’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2023

23 state decisions

160200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Harrington v. California · Tatum v. United States · United States v. Grimes · State v. Reddington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Material prejudice is established 'when in all probability ... it produced some effect upon the final result and affected the rights of the party assigning it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.