Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 SD 31 - Walker v. Walker

Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2023

8 state decisions

50200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grode v. Grode · Billion v. Billion · Zepeda v. Zepeda · Sanford v. Sanford · Terca v. Terca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is that attorney's fees associated with an alimony award also cannot be prohibited by the prenuptial agreement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.