Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 SD 75 - State v. Britton

State v. Britton’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Herring v. United States · Benjamin v. United States · United States v. Diaz · State v. Myers · United States v. Olivera-Mendez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No state, county, or municipal agency, and no state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency or law enforcement officer may use a canine to perform or assist with the performance of the specialties set forth in SDCL 23-3-35.4, unless the canine and its handler are certified by the commission as a canine team.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Each law enforcement canine team in the state shall be initially certified and annually recertified[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.