Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT 15 - State v. Moreno

State v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2021

9 state decisions

40200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Ornelas v. United States · Hudson v. Palmer · Mincey v. Arizona · New Jersey v. T. L. O.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “its provisions [should be interpreted] in harmony with other provisions in the same statute and with other statutes under the same and related chapters”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[Elach part or section should be construed in connection with every other part or section so as to produce a harmonious whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[R]easonableness is the touchstone of the constitutionality of a governmental search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.