Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT 23 - State v. Robbins

State v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), State v. Prater (2017)

79 state decisions

470200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Petree · State v. Workman · State v. Bluff · State v. Colwell · State v. Fedorowicz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) ... material inconsistencies in the testimony and (2) ... no other cireumstantial or direct evidence of the defendant's guilt.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the definition of inherently improbable must include circumstances where a witness's testimony is incredibly dubious and, as such, apparently false,”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “no reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.