Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT 53 - State v. Laycock

State v. Laycock’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Ogden (2018), Cabaness v. Thomas (2010)

38 state decisions

310200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Low · 101 Cal. App. 4th 155 - People v. Bernal · State v. Barrett · Monson v. Carver · State v. Iniguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Complete restitution' means restitution necessary to compensate a victim for all losses caused by the defendant,”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[In the case of restitution, a reviewing court will not disturb a district court's determination unless the court exceeds the authority prescribed by law or abuses its discretion.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(i) the financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment of restitution will impose, with regard to the other obligations of the defendant; (ii) the ability of the defendant to pay restitution on an installment basis or on other conditions to be fixed by the court; (ii) the rehabilitative effect on the defendant of the payment of restitution and the method of payment; and (iv) other cireamstances which the court determines may make restitution inappropriate.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.