Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT 59 - State v. Leber

State v. Leber’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Perrin v. Anderson · State v. Faison · State v. Decorso · State v. Worwood · United States v. Talamante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[rJeputation and opinion witnesses may only be asked about specific instances of conduct on eross-examination for the purpose of challenging the credibility of the reputation or opinion testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[when a person's character or character trait is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Leber, 2009 UT 59, ¶ 23 , 216 P.3d 964 (omission in original) (quoting R. Collin Mangrum & Dee Benson, Mangrum & Benson on Utah Evidence 190 (2009)); see also United States v. Talamante, 981 F.2d 1153, 1156 (10th Cir.1992) (noting that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.