Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT 67 - Bangerter v. Petty

Bangerter v. Petty’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Worwood · Muktarian v. Barmby · Ford v. . Clendenin · In Re Hoopiiaina Trust · Massey v. Griffiths

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the action is a true quiet title action, meaning an action merely to "quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another," then the statute of limitations will not bar the claim. However, the party's claim for quiet title relief can be granted only if the party succeeds on another claim, then the statute of limitations applicable to the other claim will also apply to the quiet title claim."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a true quiet title action is a suit brought to quiet an existing title against an adverse or hostile claim of another, and the effect of a decree quieting title is not to vest title but rather is to perfect an existing title as against other claimants.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “review|[ ] a trial court's legal conclusions and ultimate grant or denial of summary judgment for correctness and view[ ] the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.