Arnold v. Grigsby’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Evans v. State · State v. Casey · In Re Hoopiiaina Trust · Sill v. Hart · Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conclud[ing] that the tolling provisions of section 78-12-85 do not apply to the Arnolds' medical malpractice action against Dr. Grigsby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for consideration of other issues raised on appeal that may be necessary for proper resolution of the appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Statutory language is ambiguous if it can reasonably be understood to have more than one meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.