Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UTAPP 128 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Sandin v. Conner · Spencer v. Kemna · Legg v. United Markets International, Inc. · Perkins v. Kansas Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actual, adverse collateral consequences[,] ... we will not presume that such collateral consequences exist.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Such collateral legal consequences may include the use of the conviction to impeach the petitioner's character or as a factor in determining a sentence in a future trial, as well as the petitioner's inability to vote, engage in certain businesses, or serve on a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is of wide concern, affects the public interest, is likely to recur in a similar manner, and, because of the brief time any one person is affected, would otherwise likely escape judi-clal review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.