Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UTAPP 2 - State v. Buck

State v. Buck’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hamilton · State v. Low · State v. Saunders · State v. Kohl · State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This is so because it is the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the competing theories of the case, in light of the evidence presented and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to conclude which one they believe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[the existence of one or more alternate reasonable hypotheses does not necessarily prevent the jury from concluding that [al defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the evidence and inferences did not preclude the reasonable alternative hypothesis presented by the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.