2009 UT App 252 - State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Michigan v. Lucas · State v. Gonzales · State v. Martin · State v. Tarrats
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'from engaging in otherwise appropriate cross-examination designed to show a prototypical form of bias on the part of the witness, and thereby to expose the jury to the facts from which it could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of witnesses'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[dJenial of the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses presents a question of law which is reviewed for correctness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“otherwise admissible under these rules [and its exclusion] would violate the constitutional rights of the defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.