Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UTAPP 278 - State v. Arave

State v. Arave’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 22 Utah 2d 343 - State v. Shondel · State v. Hamilton · Walters v. Maass · State v. Fedorowicz · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “solicitation is confined to those situations where a defendant solicits a third party to commit a felony ... while attempt[ ] ... is limited to situations where the defendant directly attempts to commit [a felony].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “written so that ... the exact same conduct is not subject to different penalties depending upon which of two statutory sections a prosecutor chooses to charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “more like a pre-attempt, a testing of the waters to see if attempting an act of sodomy would likely be worthwhile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.