2009 UT App 285 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2021
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Vaknin · State v. Cram · State v. McBride · State v. Lorrah · 2007 UT App 332 - State v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Utah has adopted a modified 'but for' test to determine whether pecuniary damages actually arise out of criminal activities.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the damages would not have occurred but for the conduct underlying the ... [defendant's] conviction and (2) the causal nexus between the [criminal] conduct and the loss . is not too attenuated (either factually or temporally).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Tlo include an amount in a restitution order, the State must prove that the victim has suffered economic injury and that the injury arose out of the defendant's criminal activities.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.