Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT App 306 - Doyle v. Doyle

2009 UT App 306 - Doyle v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · Hogge v. Hogge · Maughan v. Maughan · State v. Wareham · Becker v. Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review the trial court's legal determinations regarding [a party]'s entitlement to child support modification for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “decreased sociability and his increasing behavioral and educational needs, [Doug's] failure to make various parental adjustments contemplated in the Divorcee Decree, and [Doug's] inability and unwillingness to co-parent with”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “'determination of the trial court that there [has or has not] been a substantial change of cireumstances ... is presumed valid, and we review the ruling under an abuse of discretion standard'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.