Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT App 326 - State v. Tanner

2009 UT App 326 - State v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jeffries · Freund v. Utah Power & Light Co. · State v. Fisher · State v. Cox · State v. Ireland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “able to exercise undue influence over her”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “either by occupying a position specifically listed by statute[ 4 ] or by fitting the definition of a position of special trust, which the statute clearly defines as a "position occupied by a person in a position of authority, who, by reason of that position is able to exercise undue influence over the victim."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “occupied a position of special trust in relation to [Child],”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.