Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UTAPP 345 - State v. Schwenke

State v. Schwenke’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Gould v. Ruefenacht · State v. Larsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A jury conviction is reversed for insufficient evidence only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which he was convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly to ... omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'to preserve an issue for appeal the issue must be presented to the trial court in such a way that the trial court has an opportunity to rule on that issue'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.