2009 UT App 369 - State v. Van Dyke’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · Florida v. Bostick · United States v. Arvizu · Malloy v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder these circumstances, there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant's] level of intoxication made it unsafe for him to be driving”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“[e]ven in the absence of direct evidence that the defendant drove recklessly or violated traffic rules, the jury was free to consider all of the evidence presented,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“setting out the facts from the record on appeal, we resolve all conflicts and doubts in favor of the jury's verdict and the rulings of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.