Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UTAPP 374 - Mark v. Mark

Mark v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Jones · Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest Associates · Bell v. Bell · 2008 UT App 392 - Jensen v. Jensen · 1999 UT App 41 - Rehn v. Rehn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inappropriate to attach any consequence to the consideration of fault when making an alimony award.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as long as the court exercises its discretion within the bounds and under the standards we have set and has supported its decision with adequate findings and conclusions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[The length of the marriage, the age of the recipient spouse, and the employment history and employability of the recipient spouse”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.